Problems in data treatment for ionospheric scintillation measurements
By Biagio Forte, S. Radicella. 2002
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b48a6e3ae2f8a3e73fa65e9d5ca91a8fac4f4937
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
Citations in the corpus
- Improved amplitude- and phase-scintillation indices derived from wavelet detrended high-latitude GPS data (2012, methodology): “…(Fremouw 1980) was invoked in an attempt to account for these reports, but recently it was shown that it is the use of a default cutoff frequency, designed for mid and low latitudes, in the detrending filter causing these high latitude anomalies (Forte and Radicella 2002, 2004; Forte 2005, 2007).”
- Comparison of the effect of high‐latitude and equatorial ionospheric scintillation on GPS signals during the maximum of solar cycle 24 (2015, unknown): “In addition, it should be mentioned that the conventional Butterworth detrending method may cause “phase without amplitude” scintillation phenomena frequently observed at high latitudes [Forte and Radicella, 2002; Beach, 2006; Mushini et al., 2011].”
- GPS and ionospheric scintillations (2007, background): “Forte and Radicella [2002] point out that the sf index is sensitive to how data are detrended, which may admit receiver clock noise or GPS satellite motion.”