Extending the firm vs. industry debate: Does industry life cycle stage matter?

By Ekaterina V. Karniouchina, Stephen J. Carson, Jeremy C. Short, Dave J. Ketchen. 2013

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4881f9a4aa495646026e0776fcc66d5aa6aeb27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. P. Yatim
2. Vassiliki Bamiatzi
3. G. Tomas M. Hult
4. S. Tamer Cavusgil
5. Fevzi Okumus

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Vassiliki Bamiatzi
2. G. Tomas M. Hult
3. S. Tamer Cavusgil

In Strategy and Management

1. P. Yatim
2. Ke-tsai Wu
3. Vassiliki Bamiatzi
4. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu
5. G. Tomas M. Hult
6. S. Tamer Cavusgil
7. Fevzi Okumus
8. Hui Fu

Citations in the corpus

• The entrepreneurship research in hospitality and tourism (2019, background): “However, entrepreneurship research focusing on industrial or sectorial scope (Li, 2008) is limited, although industrial dynamics (McGhan and Poter, 1997; Rumelt, 1991) and industry life cycle (Karniouchina et al., 2013) significantly influence strategy formulation and implementation.”
• Prioritization of sustainability indicators for promoting the circular economy: The case of developing countries (2019, background): “It is the stage where the market experience the highest level of heterogeneity between firms, such as product variation and market share instability for the emerging of market leader [142].”
• Revisiting the firm, industry, and country effects on profitability under recessionary and expansion periods: : A multilevel analysis (2016, background): “Therefore, the importance of firm–effects on firm performance is inevitably stronger at the expense of industry–effects (Karniouchina et al., 2013).”