Colony Collapse Disorder: A Descriptive Study

By D. vanEngelsdorp, Jay D. Evans, C. Saegerman, C. Mullin, E. Haubruge, Bach Kim Nguyen, M. Frazier, J. Frazier, D. Cox-Foster, Yanping Chen and 3 more. PLoS ONE, 2009

1,372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Over the last two winters, there have been large-scale, unexplained losses of managed honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in the United States. In the absence of a known cause, this syndrome was named Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) because the main trait was a rapid loss of adult worker bees. We initiated a descriptive epizootiological study in order to better characterize CCD and compare risk factor exposure between populations afflicted by and not afflicted by CCD. Methods and Principal Findings Of 61 quantified variables (including adult bee physiology, pathogen loads, and pesticide levels), no single measure emerged as a most-likely cause of CCD. Bees in CCD colonies had higher pathogen loads and were co-infected with a greater number of pathogens than control populations, suggesting either an increased exposure to pathogens or a reduced resistance of bees toward pathogens. Levels of the synthetic acaricide coumaphos (used by beekeepers to control the parasitic mite Varroa destructor) were higher in control colonies than CCD-affected colonies. Conclusions/Significance This is the first comprehensive survey of CCD-affected bee populations that suggests CCD involves an interaction between pathogens and other stress factors. We present evidence that this condition is contagious or the result of exposure to a common risk factor. Potentially important areas for future hypothesis-driven research, including the possible legacy effect of mite parasitism and the role of honey bee resistance to pesticides, are highlighted.

Subfields: Genetics, Insect Science, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4721db873d8e03364cc88c74d243e7fa7779f93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. D. vanEngelsdorp
  2. J. Pettis
  3. P. Neumann
  4. Robert Brodschneider
  5. P. Rosenkranz
  6. Karl Crailsheim
  7. E. Nicholls
  8. N. Carreck

In Insect Science

  1. D. vanEngelsdorp
  2. P. Neumann
  3. J. Pettis
  4. Robert Brodschneider
  5. M. Aizen
  6. Dave Goulson
  7. L. Garibaldi
  8. Karl Crailsheim

In Pharmacology

  1. P. Gallmann

Citations in the corpus