Considering the options: climate targets for all countries

By Cédric Philibert, Jonathan C. Pershing. 2001

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4711d108eb930acc4e1317362973c7cd91449b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. Richard G. Newell
3. C. Fischer
4. Kristin Reichardt
5. David Popp
6. F. Jotzo
7. T. Ueno
8. H. Coninck

In Environmental Engineering

1. Richard G. Newell
2. C. Fischer
3. Karoline S. Rogge
4. T. Ueno
5. H. Coninck
6. F. Jotzo
7. David Popp
8. F. Polzin

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. Kristin Reichardt
3. C. Fischer
4. T. Ueno
5. H. Coninck
6. Richard G. Newell
7. F. Kern
8. J. Schleich

Citations in the corpus

• Sector-based approach to the post-2012 climate change policy architecture (2008, background): “Other discussions of sectoral approaches and of non-binding emissions targets have been presented by Philibert and Pershing (2001), OECD/IEA (2002), Philibert et al. (2003) and OECD/IEA (2005), among others.”
• International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change (2008, background): “The literature evaluating post-2012 climate regimes has identified a wide variety of evaluation criteria specifically oriented toward the assessment of alternative international climate-policy approaches (Philibert and Pershing, 2001; Aldy et al., 2003; Höhne, 2005; Den Elzen, 2002; Berk et al., 200”
• Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis (2016, background): “…level, their type (e.g. specific, absolute), their governance level (e.g. EU, national), their scope (e.g. headline target, sub-target), their time horizon (e.g. long-term, interim), or their legal nature (e.g. binding, aspirational, voluntary), see EU (2013) and Philibert and Pershing (2001).”
• Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty (2007, background): “…for intensity targets as a way to draw developing countries into a climate agreement, see Baumert et al. (1999), Frankel (1999), Lutter (2000), Philibert and Pershing (2001); on the Argentine target, see Bouille and Girardin (2002), Barros and Conte Grand (2002); on the Bush ‘target’, see for…”