Components of productivity in black‐legged kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla: response to supplemental feeding

By Verena A. Gill, S. Hatch. 2002

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Parasitology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4629ff52aa5dbc62ad130001c1887818ebf1b7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Parasitology

J. Wingfield

Citations in the corpus

Changes in Canadian seabird populations and ecology since 1970 in relation to changes in oceanography and food webs (2009, background): “As predicted (Gill and Hatch 2002; Gill et al. 2002), nestling diets and growth rates reacted to environmental changes very rapidly (Parsons et al. 2008).”
Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations (2008, background): “Black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) given food over 2 years fledged twice as many chicks in the first year and three times as many in the second year (Gill and Hatch 2002).”
Changes in Seasonal Events, Peak Food Availability, and Consequent Breeding Adjustment in a Marine Bird: A Case of Progressive Mismatching (2009, background): “The number of birds present at any time depends partly on the spare time available after nutritional needs have been satisfied and is therefore sensitive to environmental conditions (Gaston and Nettleship 1982, Cairns 1987, Gill and Hatch 2002).”
Food availability and population processes: severity of nutritional stress during reproduction predicts survival of long‐lived seabirds (2010, background): “All nest sites are on wooden ledges that were constructed on the outside face of the tower, and can be accessed from inside the tower (see Gill & Hatch 2002 for details).”
Foraging strategies of the black-legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla at a North Sea colony: evidence for a maximum foraging range (2002, background): “First, the energetic requirements of rearing offspring successfully are high (Golet et al. 2000, Gill & Hatch 2002, Suryan et al. 2002).”