Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach

By R. Färe, Shawna Grosskopf, F. Hernández-Sancho. 2004

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance (2008, methodology): “McClelland (1999), Boyd et al. (2002), Färe et al. (2004), Watanabe and Tanaka (2007), and Zhou et al. (2006, 2007, 2008b).”
Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA (2015, background): “…(17.65) 35 (14.71) I.7 Environmental performance (405 / 11.36 / 6.60) Production of undesirable outputs and good Environmental performance index (Fare et al., 2004) New definition of pollution intensity and its measurement (Zaim, 2004) Regulatory standards (Zofio and Prieto, 2001)…”
An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China's iron and steel sector (2007, methodology): “MPI or DEA has also been widely used in environment performance evaluation [15–20] that considers undesirable outputs such as CO2, SO2, and NOx amongst other by-products.”
Monitoring bank performance in the presence of risk (2014, unknown): “The joint treatment of good and bad outputs is a current trend in the banking literature (Park and Weber 2006; Fukuyama and Weber 2010; Barros et al. 2012), and—to name just another research stream—is widely employed for environmental studies (Färe et al. 2004; Kumar 2006; Sueyoshi and Goto 2011).”