Institutions and Economic Performance: Endogeneity and Parameter Heterogeneity

By Theo S. Eicher, Andreas Leukert. 2009

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4458d57c40600f50735e7c9965fda03d30af79b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Toke S. Aidt
2. M. Konte
3. Cecilia García-Peñalosa
4. Emmanuel Flachaire
5. J. Dutta
6. Vania Sena

In Information Systems

1. Toke S. Aidt
2. Cecilia García-Peñalosa
3. M. Konte
4. Emmanuel Flachaire
5. J. Dutta
6. Vania Sena
7. Guglielmo Tosato
8. Eugen Dimant

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Toke S. Aidt
2. Emmanuel Flachaire
3. Cecilia García-Peñalosa
4. M. Konte
5. J. Dutta
6. Vania Sena
7. Guglielmo Tosato
8. Eugen Dimant

Citations in the corpus

• Political Versus Economic Institutions in the Growth Process (2014, background): “Our results hence suggest that when political institutions are weak, growth is more sensitive to the choice of economic institutions 3See Persson (2004) and Eicher and Leukert (2009).”
• Governance regimes, corruption and growth: theory and evidence (2008, background): “Persson and Tabellini (2003, Chapter 5), Persson (2004), and Eicher and Leukert (2006) have recently argued that the type of constitutional arrangements is an important determinant of corruption and other “structural policies” and that these arrangements only affect economic outcomes through this ”