Tracing Galaxy Formation with Stellar Halos. II. Relating Substructure in Phase and Abundance Space to Accretion Histories

By K. Johnston, James S. Bullock, Sanjib Sharma, A. Font, Brant Robertson, Samuel N. Leitner. 2008

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper explores the mapping between the observable properties of a stellar halo in phase and abundance space and the parent galaxy’s accretion history in terms of the characteristic epoch of accretion and mass and orbits of progenitor objects. The study utilizes a suite of 11 stellar halo models constructed within the context of a standard ΛCDM cosmology. The results demonstrate that coordinate-space studies are sensitive to the recent (0-8 Gyr ago) merger histories of galaxies (this timescale corresponds to the last few percent to tens of percent of mass accretion for a Milky Way-type galaxy). Specifically, the frequency, sky coverage, and fraction of stars in substructures in the stellar halo as a function of surface brightness are indicators of the importance of recent merging and of the luminosity function of infalling dwarfs. The morphology of features serves as a guide to the orbital distribution of those dwarfs. Constraints on the earlier merger history (>8 Gyr ago) can be gleaned from the abundance patterns in halo stars: within our models, dramatic differences in the dominant epoch of accretion or luminosity function of progenitor objects leave clear signatures in the [α/Fe] and [Fe/H] distributions of the stellar halo; halos dominated by very early accretion have higher average [α/Fe], while those dominated by high-luminosity satellites have higher [Fe/H]. This insight can be applied to reconstruct much about the merger histories of nearby galaxies from current and future data sets.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b43521703cc3d9814706e1133f098be50bc0a3f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Volker Springel
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. Hans-Walter Rix
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. R. Somerville

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. M. Strauss
  2. James S. Bullock
  3. Željko Ivezic´
  4. Robert Lupton
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. Jason Tumlinson
  7. G. Knapp
  8. Xiaohui Fan

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Volker Springel
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. Hans-Walter Rix
  7. A. Benson
  8. Joop Schaye

Citations in the corpus