EVALUATION OF REPLICATED PROJECTIVE MAPPING OF GRANOLA BARS

By J. Kennedy. 2010

49 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b426590474da35259bc4ed095331155dc043b768

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of sensory product profiles generated by trained assessors and consumers using CATA questions: Four case studies with complex and/or similar samples (2015, unknown): “Similar RV values have been previously regarded as indicators of good agreement between sample configurations (Abdi, Valentin, Chollet, & Chrea, 2007; Kennedy, 2010; Lawless & Glatter, 1990; Lelièvre, Chollet, Abdi, & Valentin, 2008).”
• Invited review Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science (2012, unknown): “, 1994 , 1997 ; Kennedy , 2010 ) .”
• Consumer perception of probiotic yogurt: Performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale (2013, unknown): “, 2013), granola bars (Kennedy, 2010) and beers (Lelièvre, Sylvie Chollet, Abdi, & Valentin, 2008) and even reduced-calorie biscuit packaging (Carrillo, Varela, & Fiszman, 2012a, 2012b).”