Jets in hadron–hadron collisions
By Stephen D. Ellis, J. Huston, K. Hatakeyama, P. Loch, M. Tonnesmann. 2007
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract In this article, we review some of the complexities of jet algorithms and of the resultant comparisons of data to theory. We review the extensive experience with jet measurements at the Tevatron, the extrapolation of this acquired wisdom to the LHC and the differences between the Tevatron and LHC environments. We also describe a framework (SpartyJet) for the convenient comparison of results using different jet algorithms.
Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4211783302210731fda80937224f48a5acaa0d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- A. Larkoski
- Cms Collaboration
- G. Salam
- Jesse Thaler
- G. Soyez
- Atlas Collaboration
- Michael Spannowsky
- S. Marzani
Citations in the corpus
- Jet substructure at the Tevatron and LHC: new results, new tools, new benchmarksReport prepared by the participants of the BOOST 2011 Workshop at Princeton University, 22–26 May 2011. L Asquith (lasquith@hep.anl.gov), S Rappoccio (rappocc@fnal.gov) and C K Vermilion (verm@uw.edu), editors. (2011, methodology): “The analyses are implemented in SpartyJet [76, 77], using tools based on FastJet [78, 65].”