The model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD)

By P. Kamath, W. Kim. Hepatology, 2007

1,669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Hepatology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b41b43fc30c5b4ffbbe1382fe45d3a7e7712502d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

1. P. Ginés
2. M. Bernardi
3. P. Thokala
4. J. Trebicka
5. W. Laleman
6. P. Angeli
7. Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee

In Hepatology

1. P. Ginés
2. M. Bernardi
3. J. Trebicka
4. W. Laleman
5. P. Angeli
6. Rajeshwar P. Mookerjee

In Surgery

1. P. Ginés

Citations in the corpus

• Development and validation of a prognostic score to predict mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. (2014, background): “The CLIF-SOFAs, however, is complex (based on 6 subscores, each with a 5-point range, assessing liver, kidney, brain, coagulation, respiration, and circulation), is based on consensus and expert opinion rather than data, and does not significantly improve the prediction accuracy of the model for end”
• Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, background): “waitlisted for transplantation [37] Various measures of patient “need” and ability to benefit from”