Toward a New Sexual Selection Paradigm: Polyandry, Conflict and Incompatibility (Invited Article)

By J. A. Zeh, D. W. Zeh. 2003

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b41563a5dfaf1d270bec0cf901f0daf6faeb1688

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Eberle
2. Peter M. Kappeler
3. Fabien Genin
4. O. Schülke

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Eberle
2. Peter M. Kappeler

Citations in the corpus

• The importance of considering genetic diversity in shark and ray conservation policies (2017, background): “2010; Byrne and Avise 2012), and whether multiple paternity assists in maintaining genetic diversity is a subject of debate (Zeh and Zeh 2003; Karl 2008).”
• Selected polyandry: female choice and inter-sexual conflict in a small nocturnal solitary primate (Microcebus murinus) (2004, background): “High costs of choosiness through male harassment, or the risk of male infanticide together with the benefits of good genes, necessitate female strategies that confuse and bias paternity, namely multiple mating and cryptic female choice (van Schaik 2000; van Schaik et al. 2000; Zeh and Zeh 2003; Wolf”