Reassessing emotion in climate change communication

By Daniel A. Chapman, Brian Lickel, Ezra M. Markowitz. Nature Climate Change, 2017

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b412966f1a8800199af0efca4a9992fe8a72ec68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Blanche Verlie

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Blanche Verlie
2. Z. Leviston
3. Iain Walker

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Blanche Verlie
2. Z. Leviston
3. Susie Wang
4. Mark J. Hurlstone
5. Iain Walker
6. C. Lawrence

Citations in the corpus

• Bearing worlds: learning to live-with climate change (2019, background): “Others argue against promoting certain emotions because this is both practically and ethically questionable (Chapman, Lickel, and Markowitz 2017) and contend that emotions should be acknowledged, honoured and interrogated, not promoted or manipulated (Chapman, Lickel, and Markowitz 2017; Hufnagel…”
• Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change (2018, background): “This supports some perspectives in emotion research (Chapman et al., 2017; Zeelenberg et al., 2008) – to study individual emotions separately is to view an incomplete picture.”
• Positive emotions and climate change (2021, unknown): “…that (positive) emotions should not and cannot be treated as mere ‘levers’ or ‘tools’ of behavior change (echoing the point made by Chapman et al. [47]); although the evidence base suggests that positive affect and certain discrete emotions are often positively associated with productive climate…”