Cues to fertility: perceived attractiveness and facial shape predict reproductive success

By Lena S Pflüger, E. Oberzaucher, S. Katina, I. Holzleitner, Karl Grammer. 2012

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3f82b4c09b7e9624d89e67474db1143fbaed5d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. L. Barrett
2. C. Klingenberg
3. Susan C. Roberts
4. Robin I. M. Dunbar
5. F. James Rohlf

In Geometry and Topology

1. C. Klingenberg
2. F. James Rohlf
3. Dean C. Adams
4. P. Gunz
5. P. Mitteroecker
6. P. D. Polly

Citations in the corpus

• Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications (2015, methodology): “This method has been used with semilandmarks for 2D outlines [148,294,295] and with 3D surfaces [204,296].”
• The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm (2015, background): “…therefore be due simply to differences in selective pressures acting on different primate lineages, a by-product of bipedality (Pawlowski 1999) or perhaps something not obviously related to sexual behavior, such as the presence of large adrenal glands (reviewed in Thornhill and Gangestad 2008).”