Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised.

By M. Creamer, Richard Bell, Salvina Failla. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2003

762 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial (2014, methodology): “The IES-R has demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .96) for the total scale as well as for the subscales (intrusion α = .94; avoidance α = .87; and hyperarousal α = .91) (Creamer et al., 2003).”
Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors (2020, positive): “Consistent with known gender effects we found a 2.9:1F:M ratio (χ2 = 54.98, p = < 0.001) according to IES-R and 2.8:1 (χ2 = 17.91, p = < 0.001) according to PCL-5 for clinical PTSD; 2.8:1 (χ2 = 45.45, p < 0.001) according to ZSDS and 3:1 (χ2 = 15.13, p < 0.001) according to BDI for clinical depressi”
A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak (2020, neutral): “was used to define PTSD of a clinical concern (Creamer et al., 2003; Weiss, 2007).”
Psychometric Properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised in Patients One Year After Burn Injury (2010, methodology): “This version of the IES-R is adapted from two psychometrically evaluated self-report scales, the original IES21,22 and the IES-R.23,26,27 It contains 22 items that correspond to the IES-R and are rated on the same 4-point scale as the original IES: 0, 1, 3, and 5, where 0 equals no symptom and 5 equ”