Quantum eavesdropping without interception: an attack exploiting the dead time of single-photon detectors
By H. Weier, H. Krauss, M. Rau, M. Fuerst, S. Nauerth, Harald Weinfurter. 2011
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The security of quantum key distribution (QKD) can easily be obscured if the eavesdropper can utilize technical imperfections in the actual implementation. Here, we describe and experimentally demonstrate a very simple but highly effective attack that does not need to intercept the quantum channel at all. Only by exploiting the dead time effect of single-photon detectors is the eavesdropper able to gain (asymptotically) full information about the generated keys without being detected by state-of-the-art QKD protocols. In our experiment, the eavesdropper inferred up to 98.8% of the key correctly, without increasing the bit error rate between Alice and Bob significantly. However, we find an even simpler and more effective countermeasure to inhibit this and similar attacks.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3f1659e9fe898972c8c2a433d3fe9da2c60286d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Hoi-Kwong Lo
- Kiyoshi Tamaki
- Jian-Wei Pan
- Cheng-Zhi Peng
- Chaoyang Lu
- Yuan Cao
- Marcos Curty
- Xiongfeng Ma
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Kiyoshi Tamaki
- Jian-Wei Pan
- Hoi-Kwong Lo
- Cheng-Zhi Peng
- Chaoyang Lu
- Yuan Cao
- Marcos Curty
- Xiongfeng Ma
Citations in the corpus
- Secure quantum key distribution (2014, background): “Other possible imperfections that could be exploited include, for instance, the dead-time of the detectors [85].”
- Micius quantum experiments in space (2022, methodology): “For time-shift attacks (Zhao et al., 2008) and dead-time attacks (Weier et al., 2011), the countermeasure was to operate the detector in freerunning mode, in which the detector records all the detection events and postselects the detection windows such that the detection efficiency is guaranteed to…”