Moving Toward the Deliberate Co-Production of Climate Science Knowledge

476 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating agricultural weather and climate services in Africa: Evidence, methods, and a learning agenda (2019, background): “…complicate the evaluation of WCS, thwarting the efforts of skilled evaluators and tempting information providers to defer evaluation, or to rely on more easily tracked but less meaningful metrics including web traffic, workshop participants, and peer-reviewed papers (Meadow et al., 2015) (Box 1).”
Climate vulnerability mapping: A systematic review and future prospects (2019, background): “While this may be a function of research objectives or funding source requirements, lack of engagement with stakeholders may also stem from the fact that the co-production of knowledge takes time and a commitment to process (Meadow et al., 2015).”
Potential applications of subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) predictions (2017, background): “Prioritizing collaboration between scientists and those who rely on climate and weather information to make policy and management decisions through a ‘co-exploration’ approach supports this co-production of usable information (Meadow et al., 2015; Steynor et al., 2015), especially when exploring dec”