Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review
By J. Archer. 2002
492 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3e28e5fddd737d30a714da02ec8ab5855d902f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- D. Dutton
- Ko Ling Chan
- Tonia L. Nicholls
- Nicola Graham-Kevan
- Murray A. Straus
- Agneta H. Fischer
- Lea D. L. Ciceraro
- J. Duntley
In Gender Studies
- Ko Ling Chan
- D. Dutton
- Murray A. Straus
- Tonia L. Nicholls
- Nicola Graham-Kevan
- C. Cannon
- Agneta H. Fischer
- A. Randle
In Health
- Murray A. Straus
- Ko Ling Chan
- D. Dutton
- Tonia L. Nicholls
- Nicola Graham-Kevan
- Agneta H. Fischer
- C. Cannon
- C. Evers
Citations in the corpus
- Sex Differences in Stalking and Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Two Meta-Analyses (2010, background): “In contrast, research on intimate partner aggression has shown that the presumption of female victimization and male perpetration is far from unequivocal (Archer, 2000, 2002; Card, Stucky, Sawalani, & Little, 2008).”
- A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012, unknown): “…from previous partner aggression literature reviews were searched for additional studies that were possibly not captured in database searches ( Archer, 2002; Foran & O’Leary, 2008; Schumacher et al., 2001; Stith et al., 2000; Stith et al., 2008; Stith, Smith, Penn, Ward, & Tritt, 2004;…”
- Investigating Three Explanations of Women's Relationship Aggression (2005, result): “Similar results were obtained when individual acts were investigated (Archer, 2002).”
- Gender differences in self-reports of intimate partner violence: A review (2011, methodology): “Prior reviews or meta-analyses on gender issues on IPV are often not up-to-date (e.g., Archer, 2000, 2002) or intentionally conducted as informal narrative reviews (e.g., Fiebert, 1997, 2009).”
- Illusion of Inclusion: The Failure of the Gender Paradigm to Account for Intimate Partner Violence in LGBT Relationships (2015, background): “Recent research suggests that women, like men, use violence in relationship conflicts for multiple reasons—to control, retaliate, express anger, communicate or, less often, in self-defense (Archer, 2002; Elmquist et al., 2014; Hamberger & Guse, 2002; Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Misra, et al., 2012).”
- The Social Costs and Benefits of Anger as a Function of Gender and Relationship Context (2011, background): “…including predominantly US participants, have concluded that men engage more in physical aggression, and slightly more in verbal aggression (Archer 2000, 2002, 2004; Bettencourt and Miller 1996; Eagly and Steffen 1986; Frodi et al. 1977; Hyde 1984), whether the studies were based on…”
- A review of the evidence on the effects of intimate partner violence on men. (2011, background): “…relationship: (a) physical abuse such as kicking, punching, and slapping; (b) sexual abuse; (c) threats of physical or sexual abuse; and (d) emotional abuse such as intimidation, shaming, and controlling through guilt and manipulation (Archer, 2002; Centers for Diseases Control & Prevention, 2009).”
- The Co-occurrence of Child and Intimate Partner Maltreatment in the Family: Characteristics of the Violent Perpetrators (2007, background): “However, as Archer (2002) asserts, considering women as victims of partner violence is too narrow and addressing the issue of female violence does not need to detract from the intervention and prevention of abuse against women (Archer, 2002).”
- Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships (2009, methodology): “, Buss & Shackelford, 1997; Figueredo & McCloskey, 1993; Wilson & Daly, 1993) or a measure of fecundity (Flinn, 1988), indicating that the effect is a robust one, given the diverse range of measures and designs involved. Men's physical aggression was not related to fecundity in our sample. Flinn (19”
- Male Victims of Domestic Violence (2013, background): “Some studies have shown that women would be more likely to use physical aggression than men (Archer 2000, 2002).”
- Gender Differences in the Connections Between Violence Experienced as a Child and Perpetration of Intimate Partner Violence in Young Adulthood (2008, result): “These numbers are consistent with evidence suggesting that females perpetrate some forms of violence at rates proportional or higher to males (Archer 2002; Magdol et al. 1998; Moffitt et al. 2001; Morse 1995; Straus and Gelles 1990).”
- How Much Does School Matter? An Examination of Adolescent Dating Violence Perpetration (2008, background): “, 2001) and through college-age (Archer, 2002; O'Leary & Slep, 2003; Stets _& Henderson, 1991), but then decreases across the latter part of the life span (Frieze, 2005; O'Leary & Slep).”
- A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications (2016, background): “…also acknowledges that violence can be perpetrated by men as well as women without restriction to marital, heterosexual, or homosexual relationships (Anderson, 2002; Archer, 2000, 2002; Brown, 2004; Capaldi, Kim, & Shortt, 2007; Capaldi & Owen, 2001; Hamberger & Potente1994; Straus & Gelles, 1986).”
- The evolution of intimate partner violence (2011, background): “In this article, we focus primarily on violence perpetrated by men, since men, more than women, are more likely to use extreme forms of violence such as sexual coercion, sexual assault, choking, strangling, and other forms of severe assault (Archer, 2002; Tanha, Beck, Figueredo, & Raghavan, 2010).”
- The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data (2005, methodology): “A subsequent analysis of these data (Archer 2002) in which violence was disaggregated into discrete acts, found that women were more likely than men to slap, bite, kick, punch, or hit with an object.”