Deep architectures and deep learning in chemoinformatics: the prediction of aqueous solubility for drug-like molecules

By Alessandro Lusci, Gianluca Pollastri, Pierre Baldi. 2013

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Shallow machine learning methods have been applied to chemoinformatics problems with some success. As more data becomes available and more complex problems are tackled, deep machine learning methods may also become useful. Here we present a brief overview of deep learning methods and show in particular how recursive neural network approaches can be applied to the problem of predicting molecular properties. However molecules are typically described by undirected cyclic graphs, while recursive approaches typically use directed acyclic graphs. Thus we develop methods to address this discrepancy, essentially by considering an ensemble of recursive neural networks associated with all possible vertex-centered acyclic orientations of the molecular graph. One advantage of this approach is that it relies only minimally on the identification of suitable molecular descriptors, since suitable representations are learnt automatically from the data. Several variants of this approach are applied to the problem of predicting aqueous solubility and tested on four benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that the performance of the deep learning methods matches or exceeds the performance of other state-of-the-art methods according to several evaluation metrics and expose the fundamental limitations arising from training sets that are too small or too noisy. A web-based predictor AquaSol is available online through the ChemDB portal (cdb.ics.uci.edu) together with additional material.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Charles Siegel
  2. Abhinav Vishnu
  3. Garrett B. Goh
  4. Nathan Oken Hodas
  5. Jure Leskovec
  6. Kyle Swanson
  7. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  8. Regina Barzilay

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Jure Leskovec
  2. Tommi S. Jaakkola
  3. Kyle Swanson
  4. William L. Hamilton
  5. Charles Siegel
  6. Nathan Oken Hodas
  7. Abhinav Vishnu
  8. Garrett B. Goh

In Spectroscopy

  1. Marwin H. S. Segler
  2. John B. O. Mitchell
  3. Kyle Swanson
  4. Chaopeng Shen
  5. Sean Ekins
  6. Daniel P. Russo
  7. Valery Tkachenko
  8. Alexandru Korotcov

In Computational Chemistry & Drug Discovery

  1. Kyle Swanson
  2. Abhinav Vishnu
  3. Garrett B. Goh
  4. Nathan Oken Hodas
  5. Charles Siegel
  6. Jure Leskovec
  7. Chaopeng Shen
  8. Tommi S. Jaakkola

Citations in the corpus