Global Analysis of Factors Affecting the Outcome of Freshwater Fish Introductions

By J. Ruesink. 2005

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3d8b6012c6cbf3f7e7f2bd66fa918fbaca21146

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Biological invasions in inland waters: an overview (2007, methodology): “For instance, as showed by Ruesink (2005), introduced fish species were more likely to establish when humans intended their establishment (76”
Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data (2017, background): “Ruesink (2005) also showed for fishes that omnivorous species had higher establishment success than herbivores and zooplanktivores.”
Five Potential Consequences of Climate Change for Invasive Species (2008, background): “A classic case of purposeful introduction is the sport-fishing industry (Rahel 2000; Ruesink 2005).”
Introduction, establishment and effects of non‐native salmonids: considering the risk of rainbow trout invasion in the United Kingdom* (2007, background): “In nearly all analyses of invasion success, propagule pressure has been correlated with successful establishment, for birds and plants (Kolar & Lodge 2001) and fishes (Marchetti et al., 2004; Ruesink, 2005), including those in the U.”
Crayfish invading Europe: the case study of Procambarus clarkii (2006, background): “…locality of introduction (e.g. disturbance, anthropogenic impacts, available resources, or the so-called empty niches), the interaction between species and environment that accounts for habitat and climate match, and propagule pressure (i.e. size and number of initial populations) (Ruesink 2005).”
Ecology of the invasive Asian clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) in aquatic ecosystems: an overview (2008, background): “Despite their significance, this hypothesis only recently gained a determinant importance in the biological invasion theory (Ruiz et al. 2000, Ruesink 2005, Colautti et al. 2006, Ricciardi 2007).”
Ecological Impacts of Nonnative Freshwater Fishes (2011, background): “For example, numerous fish species of cyprinids, salmonids, cichlids, and centrachids have been introduced globally (Ruesink 2005), and highly endemic species are either threatened by or have already been driven to extinction (Harrison and Stiassny 1999).”
Predicting invasiveness of species in trade: climate match, trophic guild and fecundity influence establishment and impact of non‐native freshwater fishes (2016, background): “For example, temperature tolerance (Kolar & Lodge, 2002; Bomford et al., 2010), trophic status (Marchetti et al., 2004b; Ruesink, 2005), spawning habitat requirements (Mandrak, 1989; Olden et al., 2006) and history of invasion outside the native range (Kolar & Lodge, 2002; Ribeiro et al., 2008)…”
Predicting Invasion Success: Freshwater Fishes in California as a Model (2006, background): “…a contributor to some multivariate models predicting invasion success, suggesting that widely distributed species are somewhat more likely to have other features favoring invasion success than those with narrow distributions (Marchetti et al. 2004c), a conclusion supported weakly by Ruesink (2005).”
Assessing impacts of introduced aquaculture species on native fish communities: Nile tilapia and major carps in SE Asian freshwaters (2010, background): “However, only a small proportion (about 6–22%) of nonnative fish species are associated with severe impacts on native biota, while themajority of such species integrate into existing communities with at best moderate effects (Williamson, 1996; Ruesink, 2005; Gozlan, 2008).”
A paradox of trout invasions in North America (2008, background): “If adaptation by natural selection is such a powerful force, then why are nonnative species able to become established relatively often (Ruesink 2005; Vander Zanden 2005), and why do they displace native species, which have had a long evolutionary history adapting to the local environment? In contra”
Predicting establishment success for introduced freshwater fishes: a role for climate matching (2010, background): “Although fish phylogenies are poorly resolved (Kolar and Lodge 2002; Ruesink 2003, 2005), familyre accounted for systematic variation in invasion success between the genera and attempted to quantify the unexplained variation between genera after the known characteristics of the species were taken…”
Understanding the establishment success of non-indigenous fishes: lessons from population genetics (2007, background): “In fishes and other vertebrates, high propagule pressure, human affiliation, dispersal capacity and environmental tolerance have all been shown to correlate with invasion success (Ruesink, 2005; Jeschke & Strayer, 2006).”
Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America (2006, background): “Logistic regressions are most appropriate for our dataset, especially because the response variables are binomially distributed (cf. McLain et al., 1995; Cassey et al., 2004a, b; Ruesink, 2005; Sol et al., 2005).”
Species invasions and the changing biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes (2007, background): “In freshwater ecosystems, for example, numerous fish species of carp, trout, tilapia and sunfish have been introduced globally (Ruesink, 2005), while highly endemic species are either threatened by or have already been driven to extinction (Harrison & Stiassny, 1999).”
A review of current knowledge, risk and ecological impacts associated with non-native freshwater fish introductions in South Africa. (2014, background): “High rates of establishment for intentionally introduced sport fishes are consistent with Ruesink (2005) who documented that intentionally introduced fishes were more likely (384/506 = 76”
Freshwater fish introductions in mediterranean‐climate regions: are there commonalities in the conservation problem? (2010, background): “Conservation of these highly endemic assemblages is a paramount challenge for conservation managers, researchers and officials, as the impact of freshwater fish introductions is greatest in regions of high endemism (Ruesink, 2005).”
Introduction of Non-Native Oysters: Ecosystem Effects and Restoration Implications (2005, background): “Relevant data come from biocontrol releases (Beirne 1975), horticultural plants (Rejmanek & Richardson 1996, Reichard & Hamilton 1997), and imports of birds, mammals, and fishes (Veltman et al. 1996, Blackburn & Duncan 2001, Forsyth et al. 2004, Ruesink 2005).”