Does the scientific evidence support the recovery model

By R. Warner. 2010

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This editorial addresses the question of whether some of the basic tenets of the recovery model – optimism about outcome, the value of work, the importance of empowerment of patients and the utility of user-run programmes – are supported by the scientific research.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3cb4d80c3faa513593e48bb9bea03e01fbf053c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Turton
2. G. Mezey
3. A. Demetriou
4. C. Wright
5. Michael Kavuma

Citations in the corpus

• No more psychiatric labels: Why formal psychiatric diagnostic systems should be abolished (2014, unknown): “…has been found to be associated with lower self-esteem, despair, and hopelessness (Bassman, 2000) and is negatively correlated with emotional well-being, economic satisfaction, and vocational status (Hasson-Ohanon, Kravetz, Roe, David, & Weiser, 2006; Leff & Warner, 2006; Warner, 2010).”
• Perceptions, experiences and meanings of recovery in forensic psychiatric patients (2010, background): “Stigma is known to be associated with poor social and symptomatic outcome (Warner, 2010) and forensic patients represent a particularly stigmatized group.”