A comparison of shark and wolf research reveals similar behavioral responses by prey
By Aaron J. Wirsing, W. Ripple. 2011
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3bc5f98cf83b3a6d32bb172c85290eb64feddfc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- Lawrence M. Dill
- Michael R. Heithaus
- C. Simpfendorfer
- M. Heupel
- D. Knip
- N. Dulvy
- Janet Mann
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- C. Simpfendorfer
- Michael R. Heithaus
- Lawrence M. Dill
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- M. Heupel
- D. Knip
- N. Dulvy
- D. W. Sims
Citations in the corpus
- The ecological importance of intact top-predator populations: a synthesis of 15 years of research in a seagrass ecosystem (2012, background): “…of grasshoppers at risk from spiders (Schmitz 2008), terrestrial ungulates at risk from large mammalian predators (e.g. Sinclair and Arcese 1995; Wirsing and Ripple 2011) and small freshwater taxa at risk from a variety of fish and invertebrate predators (e.g. Werner and Hall 1988; Abrahams and…”
- Sizing up the ecological role of sharks as predators (2014, background): “One of the few ex - amples of the pertinence of the behavioural role of sharks highlights similarities in predation pressure by 292 Heupel et al.: Ecological role of sharks tiger sharks and wolves—suggesting application of the behavioural definition can be appropriate (Wirsing & Ripple 2011).”