A critique for phytosociology

By J. Ewald. 2003

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b394ec443c2f4de183846516385a9a070aaaffc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. F. Jansen
2. János Podani
3. Jürgen Dengler
4. Pierre Legendre
5. Werner Ulrich
6. A. Baselga
7. Élisa Thébault

In Plant Science

1. János Podani
2. Jürgen Dengler
3. F. Jansen

Citations in the corpus

• Plant names in vegetation databases – a neglected source of bias (2010, methodology): “This discrepancy can probably be attributed to a lack of awareness about the high potential of this resource but also to methodological problems resulting from the use of data that originate from numerous and heterogeneous sources (Ewald 2003).”
• Braun-Blanquet's legacy and data analysis in vegetation science (2006, background): “General plant ecology has benefited much from the phytosociological approach (Ewald 2003), and the tradition lives on as demonstrated by new books re-iterating, re-formulating and updating the fundamental concepts (e.”