Support Theory for Preconditioning
By E. Boman, Bruce Hendrickson. 2003
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
In Computational Mechanics
- J. Langford
- Shang-Hua Teng
- Miroslav Dud'ik
- Olga Sorkine-Hornung
- Imed Zitouni
- Daniel A. Spielman
- Akshay Krishnamurthy
- Adith Swaminathan
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Daniel A. Spielman
- Shang-Hua Teng
- Olga Sorkine-Hornung
- J. Langford
- Akshay Krishnamurthy
- Adith Swaminathan
- Alekh Agarwal
- Nikhil Srivastava
Citations in the corpus
- Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendation (2016, background): “Claim 5 (Boman and Hendrickson [3]) .”
- Differential Representations for Mesh Processing (2006, background): “The Laplacian matrix is notoriously ill-conditioned: when we add only one anchor, the largest singular value of L̃ is proportional to the maximal degree in the mesh, while a good estimate for the smallest singular value is one over the product of the maximum topological distance of a vertex from the”
- Spectral Sparsification of Graphs (2008, methodology): “roof of Lemma 10.2 uses the following lemma bounding how well a path preconditions an edge. It is an example of a Poincar´e inequality [DS91], and it may be derived from the Rank-One Support Lemma of [BH03], the Congestion-Dilation Lemma of [BGH+06], or the Path Lemma of [ST08b]. We include a proof ”
- High-Pass Quantization for Mesh Encoding (2003, unknown): “The small eigenvalue of a basic invertible Lapacian is typically tiny; a good estimate for |λ −1 n | is the product of the maximum topological distance of a vertex from the anchor vertex, and the number of vertices in the mesh (assuming there is one connected component; otherwise the maximum of the ”
- Spectral Graph Theory (2012, methodology): “The resulting bounds are called Poincaré inequalities, and are closely related to the bounds used in the analysis of preconditioners in Chapter 12 and in related works [64, 65, 66, 67].”
- Nearly-linear time algorithms for graph partitioning, graph sparsification, and solving linear systems (2003, methodology): “for every β> 0. Boman and Hendrickson [ 6 , 7] applied the trees of [2] to construct 0-ultra-sparse m 1+o(1) -approximations of A, and showed that these could be used to solve arbitrary SDD systems in time m 1.5+o(1) log(κf (A)/� ). Exploiting”
- Nearly-Linear Time Algorithms for Preconditioning and Solving Symmetric, Diagonally Dominant Linear Systems (2006, methodology): “An algebraic extension of Vaidya’s techniques for bounding the condition number was presented by Boman and Hendrickson [BH03b], and later used by them [BH01] to prove that the low-stretch spanning trees constructed by Alon, Karp, Peleg, and West [AKPW95], yield preconditioners for which the precondi”