Explainable machine learning predictions to help anesthesiologists prevent hypoxemia during surgery
By Scott M. Lundberg, Bala G. Nair, M. Vavilala, M. Horibe, Michael J. Eisses, Trevor L. Adams, D. Liston, D. Low, Shu-Fang Newman, Jerry H. Kim and 1 more. 2017
36 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health Informatics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Su-In Lee
- Scott M. Lundberg
- Marinka Zitnik
- Gabriel Erion-Barner
- Jure Leskovec
- Hugh Chen
- Alex J. DeGrave
- Bala G. Nair
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Health Informatics
Citations in the corpus
- Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles (2018, background): “While model agnostic individualized explanation methods [2, 9, 16, 21, 27] can be applied to trees [17], they are significantly slower than treespecific methods and have sampling variability (see Section 5.”
- Explainable AI for Trees: From Local Explanations to Global Understanding (2019, background): “It is particularly important in medical applications, where the patterns uncovered by a model are often even more important than the model’s prediction performance [64, 42].”
- Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities (2018, background): “An early application of explainability in biomedicine includes [354], an approach that integrates high fidelity data from a hospital’s information management system ( e.g. , data from patient monitors and anesthesia machines, medications, laboratory re-sults, and electronic medical records) to…”
- From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees (2020, background): “Explaining predictions from tree models is particularly important in medical applications, where the patterns a model uncovers can be more important than the model’s prediction performance 15,16 .”