Prediction of Complex Human Traits Using the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor

By G. de los Campos, Ana I Vazquez, Rohan L. Fernando, Yann C. Klimentidis, D. Sorensen. PLoS Genetics, 2013

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite important advances from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), for most complex human traits and diseases, a sizable proportion of genetic variance remains unexplained and prediction accuracy (PA) is usually low. Evidence suggests that PA can be improved using Whole-Genome Regression (WGR) models where phenotypes are regressed on hundreds of thousands of variants simultaneously. The Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP, a ridge-regression type method) is a commonly used WGR method and has shown good predictive performance when applied to plant and animal breeding populations. However, breeding and human populations differ greatly in a number of factors that can affect the predictive performance of G-BLUP. Using theory, simulations, and real data analysis, we study the performance of G-BLUP when applied to data from related and unrelated human subjects. Under perfect linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and QTL, the prediction R-squared (R2) of G-BLUP reaches trait-heritability, asymptotically. However, under imperfect LD between markers and QTL, prediction R2 based on G-BLUP has a much lower upper bound. We show that the minimum decrease in prediction accuracy caused by imperfect LD between markers and QTL is given by (1−b)2, where b is the regression of marker-derived genomic relationships on those realized at causal loci. For pairs of related individuals, due to within-family disequilibrium, the patterns of realized genomic similarity are similar across the genome; therefore b is close to one inducing small decrease in R2. However, with distantly related individuals b reaches very low values imposing a very low upper bound on prediction R2. Our simulations suggest that for the analysis of data from unrelated individuals, the asymptotic upper bound on R2 may be of the order of 20% of the trait heritability. We show how PA can be enhanced with use of variable selection or differential shrinkage of estimates of marker effects.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b37ea6e3e7d618d59dc15e1af5d68f2fe0d483ed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. P. Pérez
  2. G. de los Campos
  3. G. Covarrubias-Pazaran
  4. Jiabo Wang
  5. Zhiwu Zhang

In Plant Science

  1. P. Pérez
  2. G. de los Campos
  3. G. Covarrubias-Pazaran
  4. Jiabo Wang
  5. Zhiwu Zhang

Citations in the corpus