Rethinking Risk Assessment. The MacArthur study of Mental Disorder and Violence

By A. Maden. 2003

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

![][1] Over-funded, over-hyped, and over there. It is impossible for a British psychiatrist to look at the MacArthur study without a twinge, if not a spasm, of envy. There are many reasons - 8 million to be specific, that being the dollar cost of this epic. I mean to say, in England,

Subfields: Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b37d8af27ce19d42a5e4367249f0b17a9e11f766

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. D. DeMatteo
2. Joel T. Andrade
3. J. Edens

Citations in the corpus

• The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in court: A case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004). (2006, background): “…debate regarding the capacity of mental health professionals to identify those individuals who will engage in violent behavior in the future (Cunningham & Reidy, 1999, 2002; Edens, Buffington-Vollum, Keilen, Roskamp, & Anthony, 2005; Ewing, 1983; Monahan & Steadman, 1994; Monahan et al., 2001).”
• Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment and Treatment: New Approaches for Mental Health Professionals (2009, methodology): “Hallucinations in general were not predictive of violence; however, command auditory hallucinations to engage in a violent act increased the subject’s risk for violence (Monahan et al., 2001).”