Mortality and predation in ecosystem models: is it important how these are expressed?
By Elizabeth A. Fulton, Anthony D. M. Smith, Craig R. Johnson. 2003
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract The effects of the form of the grazing and mortality terms used in plankton models are well known. The same cannot be said for ecosystem models. As ecosystem models become more popular more needs to be known about the effects of model formulation on model behaviour and performance. The impact of the form of the grazing response function and mortality terms used in a biogeochemical ecosystem model are considered here. We show that in the large and inter-linked webs used in ecosystem models, model behaviour is far more sensitive to the form of the grazing term than to that of the mortality terms that close the modelled food web. When using biogeochemical ecosystem models in shallow marine ecosystems, the most dynamic and sophisticated functional responses describing grazing require more parameters and validation than the simpler Holling disk equation, but usually still lead to the same general conclusions about the system state and the effects of changes in forcing functions. Thus, the use of more complex functional responses is not necessarily warranted in many cases. Similarly, the extra effort and data required to explicitly represent the top predators (sharks, mammals and birds) is not necessary if they are not the focus of the study. A quadratic mortality term applied to intermediate predators (such as piscivores) is sufficient to achieve plausible model behaviour. It should be noted, however, that some degree of sophistication is required in the grazing and mortality terms. Use of simple linear functional responses and mortality terms is unsuitable for models used to consider a range of nutrient loading or harvesting scenarios.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b36aaccd47c254f4679a32b81c98d0dd7a4fc5f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Bridging the gap between marine biogeochemical and fisheries sciences; configuring the zooplankton link (2014, methodology): “However, there are many studies demonstrating how this unsupported choice has a pronounced effect on trophic dynamics and ecological stability (e.g., Steele and Henderson, 1981, 1992; Edwards and Yool, 2000; Fulton et al., 2003).”
- A coupled plankton-anchovy population dynamics model assessing nonlinear controls of anchovy and gelatinous biomass in the Black Sea (2008, background): “The natural (predation) mortality rate is expressed by (3b) that comprises the sum of linear and quadratic contributions (Fulton et al. 2003, Tian et al. 2004).”
- Modeling What We Sample and Sampling What We Model: Challenges for Zooplankton Model Assessment (2017, background): “Of course, models (of any kind) do not need to represent every detail of the environment to be useful or address a specific question (Fulton et al., 2003), however we do know that zooplankton is essential to understanding the transfer of energy to fish and fisheries (Friedland et al., 2012;…”