The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots
By C. Mettke-Hofmann, H. Winkler, B. Leisler. 2002
352 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Parasitology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3629acb964722b18ad6a34ac1a934d148571f93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Parasitology
- Simon M. Reader
- A. Schofield
- K. Arnold
- A. Møller
- Katherine A. Herborn
- R. Macleod
- L. Alexander
- L. Garamszegi
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution (2007, methodology): “Extending this approach, Mettke-Hofmann et al. (2002) examined the link between ecological factors and neophobia and exploration in 61 parrot species in captivity.”
- A taste for novelty in invading house sparrows, Passer domesticus (2005, background): “Alternatively, differences in environmental conditions after or during ontogeny may have influenced foraging behavior between sparrow populations (Greenberg, 1990b; Mettke-Hofmann et al., 2002; Minvielle et al., 2002).”
- Behavioural syndromes and trappability in free-living collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis (2009, background): “Moreover, differences in diet can also shape species-specific behavioural types that help to gather information about the environment (Mettke-Hofmann et al. 2002).”
- Innovation and social learning: individual variation and brain evolution * (2003, neutral): “There are few other examinations of interspeci c relationships between novelty responses and innovation, though several authors have addressed species differences in neophobia and neophilia (e.g., Glickman and Sroges, 1966; Greenberg and Mettke-Hofman, 2001; Mettke-Hofmann et al., 2002).”
- Personality in captivity reflects personality in the wild (2010, background): “While the contrast to great tits is surprising, divergences in trait correlations between closely related species (e.g. Mettke-Hofmann et al. 2002; MettkeHofmann & Gwinner 2004) and even populations of the same species (Bell & Sih 2007; Dingemanse et al. 2007) can be explained by different…”
- Effects of Group Size on Approach to Novel Objects in Ravens (Corvus corax) (2006, background): “Interspecific differences in neophobia depend on ecology and social organization (Fragaszy & Mason 1978; Greenberg 1983, 1990, 1992; Mettke-Hofmann et al. 2002; Day et al. 2003).”
- Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences (2012, methodology): “The analyses reported here are based on extensive data on FIDs collected by APM in France and Denmark during February–September 2006–2008, using a modified technique developed by Blumstein (2006). A full description of the procedures and 3 different cross-validations of the data are reported in Møll”
- Wariness of coyotes to camera traps relative to social status and territory boundaries (2003, background): “While the level of neophobia can be affected by the frequency with which an animal encounters novel objects (Mettke-Hofmann et al. 2002) and by previous experience with other objects (Pedersen 1994), neophobia is not a learned response.”
- A meta-analysis of correlated behaviours with implications for behavioural syndromes: mean effect size, publication bias, phylogenetic effects and the role of mediator variables (2012, background): “At the interspecific level, comparative studies in birds identified the most important evolutionary determinants of risk-taking and exploration (Mettke-Hofmann et al. 2002; Blumstein 2006; Møller and Garamszegi 2012).”