Dissemination of cooking energy alternatives in India--a review

By S. D. Pohekar, Dinesh Kumar, M. Ramachandran. 2005

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b321b7bad09572abc8a8421c520ed2263159e7f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Energy Engineering and Power Technology

1. I. Jan

In Pollution

1. Jessica J. Lewis
2. I. Jan
3. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
4. Tara Chandra Kandpal
5. P. Diwan
6. M. Yaqoot

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Jessica J. Lewis
2. I. Jan
3. Subhrendu K. Pattanayak

Citations in the corpus

• Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review (2012, background): “2009), user engagement (Pohekar et al. 2005), technology design that responds to consumer preference (Sinton et al.”
• What makes people adopt improved cookstoves? Empirical evidence from rural northwest Pakistan (2012, background): “One of the factors that results in high demand for fuelwood is its low combustion efficiency (Muneer and Mohamed, 2003; Pohekar et al., 2005).”
• Review of barriers to the dissemination of decentralized renewable energy systems (2016, background): “…studies have cited inappropriateness of technology or poor design as a significant technical barrier to the adoption of DRES (Quadir et al., 1995; Pohekar et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2012; Chandrasekar and Kandpal, 2007; Adams et al., 2011; Prasertsan and Sajjakulnukit, 2006; Rijal, 1986a;…”