On the Choice of the Number of Class Intervals in the Application of the Chi Square Test
By H. B. Mann, A. Wald. 1942
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jayadev Acharya
- Clément Louis Canonne
- Himanshu Tyagi
- Ihab F. Ilyas
- Jason Perry
- Peter J. Haas
- Paul Geoffrey Brown
- Kabir K. Dutta
Citations in the corpus
- Inference Under Information Constraints I: Lower Bounds From Chi-Square Contraction (2018, background): “[39]), with particular interest on the large-support and small-sample case where the usual normal approximations of statistics do not apply (cf.”
- CORDS: automatic discovery of correlations and soft functional dependencies (2004, methodology): “We also restrict the discussion to the case of categorical or discrete-valued data—see [15] for a discussion of how to apply the chi-squared test to real-valued data.”
- A Tale of Tails: An Empirical Analysis of Loss Distribution Models for Estimating Operational Risk Capital (2006, background): “Mann and Wald (1942) and Cohen and Sackrowitz (1975) proved that Pearson’s test statistic is unbiased when the cells are chosen to have equal probabilities under the null.”
- A Bayesian chi^2 test for goodness-of-fit (2004, unknown): “, Moore and Spruill (1975), although emphasis there focuses on randomized cells rather than on posterior sampling of parameter vectors.”