On Prediction Using Variable Order Markov Models

By Ron Begleiter, Ran El-Yaniv, Golan Yona. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2004

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper is concerned with algorithms for prediction of discrete sequences over a finite alphabet, using variable order Markov models. The class of such algorithms is large and in principle includes any lossless compression algorithm. We focus on six prominent prediction algorithms, including Context Tree Weighting (CTW), Prediction by Partial Match (PPM) and Probabilistic Suffix Trees (PSTs). We discuss the properties of these algorithms and compare their performance using real life sequences from three domains: proteins, English text and music pieces. The comparison is made with respect to prediction quality as measured by the average log-loss. We also compare classification algorithms based on these predictors with respect to a number of large protein classification tasks. Our results indicate that a "decomposed" CTW (a variant of the CTW algorithm) and PPM outperform all other algorithms in sequence prediction tasks. Somewhat surprisingly, a different algorithm, which is a modification of the Lempel-Ziv compression algorithm, significantly outperforms all algorithms on the protein classification problems.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b31147832cf46357edb96f0276011c1ee3112e24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Le Song
  2. Hanjun Dai
  3. Yun Raymond Fu
  4. Kai Liu
  5. Jin Zhang
  6. Fei Cheng
  7. Wenwen Ding
  8. Rakshit S. Trivedi

In Information Systems

  1. Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
  2. Le Song
  3. Nan Du
  4. Kai Liu
  5. Hanjun Dai
  6. Daniel Struck
  7. Yun Raymond Fu
  8. J. L. Boudec

In Molecular Biology

  1. Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez
  2. Le Song
  3. Nan Du
  4. Jie Hu
  5. Kang Li
  6. Hanjun Dai
  7. Yun Raymond Fu
  8. J. L. Boudec

Citations in the corpus