Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
By Andrea Manica. 2004
87 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b31039f367c3f82f3712c8f2194dc311a0460c2f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Sneaking from a female perspective (2007, background): “Similarly, simulated intrusions by sneaking males led to an increase in filial cannibalism and decrease in parental effort by guarder male scissortail sergeant, Abudefduf sexfasciatus (Manica 2004).”
- Ventilation or nest defense—parental care trade-offs in a fish with male care (2006, background): “Three studies on parental care and filial cannibalism, one on common gobies and two on bluegill sunfish, all showed that small clutches were completely eaten more often than larger ones, regardless of parental body condition (Kvarnemo et al. 1998; Neff 2003; Manica 2004).”