The Global Impacts of Biofuel Mandates

By Thomas W. Hertel, W. Tyner, Dileep K. Birur. 2010

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2cac355f88f05c0c1b73ddc1d173c6a0c9888e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Thomas W. Hertel
2. Jayson Beckman
3. W. Tyner
4. R. Plevin
5. K. Deininger
6. Daniel M. Kammen
7. John P. Weyant
8. Madhu Khanna

In Pollution

1. Jayson Beckman
2. Thomas W. Hertel
3. W. Tyner
4. K. Deininger
5. Daniel M. Kammen

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Jayson Beckman
2. Thomas W. Hertel
3. D. V. van Vuuren
4. Elmar Kriegler
5. John P. Weyant
6. W. Tyner
7. Harvey E. Lapan
8. Daniel M. Kammen

Citations in the corpus

• Commodity Price Volatility in the Biofuel Era: An Examination of the Linkage between Energy and Agricultural Markets (2010, unknown): “Commodity Price Volatility in the Biofuel Era 211 produced in 2008.13 We implement this mandate by increasing U.S. ethanol production through an exogenous quantity increase, following Hertel, Tyner, and Birur (2010).”
• Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses (2010, methodology): “In this article we use the global economic commodity and trade model, GTAP-BIO (Hertel et al. 2010), to provide a new, comprehensive analysis of market-mediated changes in global land use in response to the expansion of US-grown maize for ethanol.”
• Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop (2010, unknown): “impact of large-scale biomass production have been intensely debated and investigated in recent years (Dohleman et al., 2010; Dornburg et al., 2010; Fargione et al., 2008; Hertel et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2009; Levasseur et al., 2010; Reijnders, 2010; Smeets and Faaij, 2010; Solom”
• Second-best biofuel policies and the welfare effects of quantity mandates and subsidies (2012, background): “The computed indirect land use effects of planned biofuels mandates could be quite sizeable [14].”
• Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management (2014, background): “…that bioenergy is valuable with the more narrowly focused indirect land-use and lifecycle analysis emissions discussion estimating reduced net emissions benefits, and potentially increased net emissions, with increased use of bioenergy (e.g., Searchinger et al. 2008; Hertel et al. 2010).”
• Challenges posed by the new wave of farmland investment (2011, background): “Population growth, rising incomes, and urbanization will continue to drive demand for food products, especially oils and livestock, derived demands for feed and industrial products, and biofuel mandates (Hertel et al. 2010).”
• Validating Energy-Oriented CGE Models (2009, methodology): “1 See Banse et al. (2008); Berrittella et al. (2005, 2006); Bosello et al. (2007); Gan and Smith (2006); Hertel et al. (2010); Kemfert et al. (2006); Nijkamp et al. (2005); Ronneberger et al. (2006); Rosen (2003); Taheripour et al. (2010).”