Postprocessing decision trees to extract actionable knowledge
By Qiang Yang, Jie Yin, Charles X. F. Ling, Tielin Chen. 2003
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Mounia Lalmas
- Fabrizio Silvestri
- Andrew Haines
- Yixin Chen
- Qiang Yang
- Charles X. F. Ling
- Rong Pan
- Yujie He
In Information Systems
In Signal Processing
- Qiang Yang
- Fabrizio Silvestri
- Charles X. F. Ling
- Jie Yin
- Longbing Cao
- Chengqi Zhang
- Zhicheng Cui
- Yixin Chen
Citations in the corpus
- Interpretable Predictions of Tree-based Ensembles via Actionable Feature Tweaking (2017, background): “Many works discuss post-processing techniques specically tailored to decision trees [8, 16, 24, 25].”
- Knowledge actionability: satisfying technical and business interestingness (2007, methodology): “…measures such as unexpectedness (Silberschatz and Tuzhilin, 1995; Padmanabhan and Tuzhilin, 1998, 1999), actionability (Silberschatz and Tuzhilin, 1995, 1996; Yang et al., 2003; Cao and Zhang, 2006, 2007) and novelty (Tuzhilin, 2002) were studied to evaluate pattern actionable capability.”
- Optimal Action Extraction for Random Forests and Boosted Trees (2015, background): “Techniques have also been proposed to postprocess decision trees to extract actionable knowledge [31, 19, 30, 12].”
- Extracting Actionable Knowledge from Decision Trees (2007, background): “Actions, such as direct mailing and sales promotion, cost money to the enterprise [42].”