Face recognition with support vector machines: global versus component-based approach
By Bernd Heisele, Purdy Ho, Tomaso A. Poggio. Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001, 2001
554 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2c48bfbd582e345e93ebdc1afc8d9416369555f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- A review on Gabor wavelets for face recognition (2006, methodology): “A set of SVM classifiers is applied to extract different facial components and the gray values of each component are combined into a single feature vector [2].”
- Applications of Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition: A Survey (2002, methodology): “Since SVMs are known to generalize well even in high dimensional spaces under small training sample conditions [5] and have shown to be superior to traditional empirical risk minimization principle employed by most of neural networks [6], SVMs have been successfully applied to a number of applicatio”
- Human face recognition based on multidimensional PCA and extreme learning machine (2011, methodology): “To enhance the discriminative power of extracted features and to achieve superior face recognition researchers have also proposed the use of Bayesian framework [12,13] and support vector machines (SVM) [14,15].”
- Face Recognition: A Literature Review (2008, unknown): “Reference [69] presented a component-based technique and two global techniques for face recognition and evaluated their performance with respect to robustness against pose changes.”
- Hierarchical Ensemble of Global and Local Classifiers for Face Recognition (2009, result): “The conflicting results of the two classifiers interestingly reflect the above-mentioned different roles of global and local information, which suggests that ideal classifier should be the combination of the two “experts.””
- Robust sparse coding for face recognition (2011, methodology): “Face recognition (FR) is among the most visible and challenging research topics in computer vision and pattern recognition [29], and many methods, such as Eigenfaces [21], Fisherfaces [2] and SVM [7], have been proposed in the past two decades.”
- Recent advances in visual and infrared face recognition - a review (2005, methodology): “SVM has applied to face recognition [99–102] and gender classification [103].”
- Pedestrian detection and tracking with night vision (2005, background): “recognition such as faces [19], [25], [31], face components [19], and pedestrians [22], [26].”
- Locally linear discriminant analysis for multimodally distributed classes for face recognition with a single model image (2005, background): “There are a number of conventional techniques that have been developed for view-invariant face recognition [4], [6], [10], [12], [13], [15], [25], [26], [28].”
- SVM-Based Multimodal Classification of Activities of Daily Living in Health Smart Homes: Sensors, Algorithms, and First Experimental Results (2010, background): “In this section we will introduce the flat and its equipment and also the notion of Activity of Daily Living and our selected activities to objectivize, in the future, ADLs scale.”
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning: Evolving Machine Intelligence Toward Tomorrow’s Intelligent Network Traffic Control Systems (2017, methodology): “The “origin” flow pattern inference is performed for the traffic generated from a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) in [188] by applying SVMs.”
- Learning Hybrid Image Templates (HIT) by Information Projection (2012, methodology): “Inspired by the cortex-like systems [33], [35], [36], we have adopted a recursive SUM-MAX procedure similar to [2], which is described in Algorithm 2.”