Age-related changes in memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective.
By M. Prull, John D. E. Gabrieli, Silvia A. Bunge. 2000
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2b6f6d1473f2b2a0d0f280061173a41c38cf430
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Lars Nyberg
- Lars Bäckman
- Simon W. Davis
- Ulman E. R. Lindenberger
- Roberto Cabeza
- Sander M. Daselaar
- Nancy A. Dennis
- Shu-Chen Li
Citations in the corpus
- Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. (2008, methodology): “First, both studies used semantic retrieval tasks, whereas the current study examined both ER and VP. Unlike ER (for review, see Prull et al. 2000) and visuospatial abilities (Jenkins et al. 2000), semantic retrieval is well preserved in older adults (Craik et al. 1995) and may not require the same…”
- The correlative triad among aging, dopamine, and cognition: current status and future prospects. (2006, background): “Note that these patterns of impairment resemble closely those observed in aging (Prull et al., 1999).”
- Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. (2005, background): “Thus, older adults show deficits on attention and memory tasks that require the generation and maintenance of internal strategies rather than just reliance on external cues [6–8].”