Logit Models from Economics and Other Fields
By J. Cramer. 2003
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- P. Berry
- Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell
- Anna-Leena Downie
- Terence P. Dawson
- K. Howell
- Canran Liu
- Richard G. Pearson
- Andrew Kenny
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data (2011, background): “, 2006); (2) a threshold based on the prevalence of the species calibration data (Cramer, 2003; Franklin et al., 2009); and (3) a fixed threshold value of 0.”
- Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions (2005, methodology): “Cramer (2003) also realized the problem with fixed threshold approach, especially taking 0.5 as the threshold.”
- Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models using Logit and Probit: A New Method (2010, methodology): “This comes about because, in nonlinear probability models, the error variance is not independently identified and is fixed at a given value (Cramer 2003:22).2 This identification restriction is well known in the literature on limited dependent variable models (Yatchew and Griliches 1985, Long 1997;…”
- An Almost Integration-free Approach to Ordered Response Models (2006, methodology): “Logit analysis (see Cramer (2003) for a recent survey).”
- The distribution of deep-sea sponge aggregations in the North Atlantic and implications for their effective spatial management (2016, methodology): “Five thresholding methods recommended by Liu et al., (2005) were considered for each model: sensitivity-specificity equality, sensitivity-specificity sum maximization, ROC-plot-252 based approaches (Cantor et al., 1999), prevalence, and average probability/suitability approaches (Cramer 2003).”