Empirical mode decomposition using rational splines: an application to rainfall time series
By G. Pegram, M. Peel, Thomas Aquinas McMahon. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2008
64 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Empirical mode decomposition (EMD), a relatively new form of time-series decomposition, has the feature of not assuming that a time series is linear or stationary, as is implicitly done in Fourier analysis. In natural time series such as records of rainfall, streamflow, temperature, etc., where most variables exhibit nonlinear and non-stationary behaviour, this feature is particularly useful, allowing more meaningful quantification of the proportion of variance in a time series due to fluctuations at different time scales, than previous spectral analysis techniques. However, in its original form, the EMD algorithm relies on cubic spline interpolation of the extrema, which often inflate the variance of the resultant components (intrinsic mode functions) and residual. In this paper, a suggested improvement to the EMD algorithm, using rational splines and flexible treatment of the end conditions, is outlined and the consequent effect on three exemplary annual rainfall time series is assessed as a proof of concept. It is recognized that many more examples are needed for the fine tuning of the ideas before it can be widely recommended and this work is currently underway.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2a6c0ec0c75b31300bc23343581cf38cf51a021
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of methods for non-stationary hydrologic frequency analysis: Case study using annual maximum daily precipitation in Taiwan (2017, methodology): “…and this approach has been used to analyze various types of climate data (Xie et al., 2002; Duffy, 2005; Li and Davis, 2006; Wu et al., 2007; Pegram et al., 2008; McDonald et al., 2007; McMahon et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2009; Franzke, 2009; Lee and Ouarda, 2010, 2012; Chang et al., 2011).”