Stock identification methods : applications in fishery science

By S. Cadrin, Kevin D. Friedland, J. Waldman. 2005

375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2a3360ecb6fe681e510a484d11e043669153c90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Robin S. Waples
2. S. Cadrin
3. M. Dickey‐Collas
4. J. Cope
5. N. Hintzen
6. E. Hatfield
7. M. Bernreuther
8. Francisco Saborido-Rey

Citations in the corpus

• Residency and depth movements of a coastal group of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) (2006, background): “Fisheries biologists characterise stocks and populations through a combination of genetics, morphological analyses and tag-recapture experiments (Cadrin et al. 2004).”
• Lessons learned from practical approaches to reconcile mismatches between biological population structure and stock units of marine fish (2017, background): “In such cases, mixed-stock analysis is a powerful tool that provides information on the stock composition of current fisheries, and also offers insights on temporal changes in population proportions in catches and the causes of those changes (Cadrin et al., 2005).”
• Population structure of beaked redfish, Sebastes mentella: evidence of divergence associated with different habitats (2010, background): “…interpretations of what aspect of stock structure each methodological approach represents, e.g. the different perspectives gained from genetic vs. phenotypic approaches, or the different sensitivities of genetic markers, as developed by Cadrin et al. (2005), helped to resolve incongruent results.”
• Migration and behavior of juvenile North Pacific albacore ( Thunnus alalunga ) (2011, background): “In addition, while these data suggest limited mixing between the northern versus southern fishery areas in the Eastern Pacific, genetics and otolith microchemistry studies (Cadrin et al., 2005) may provide more conclusive evidence regarding stock structure in the eastern Pacific.”
• Widespread genetic introgression of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon in wild salmon populations (2016, background): “We excluded fish classified as escaped farmed salmon, or with uncertain classification, based on their growth patterns in the scales (Lund and Hansen, 1991; Fiske et al., 2005).”
• Integrating genetic data into management of marine resources: how can we do it better? (2008, background): “For example, in the 1950s, dissatisfaction with performance of phenotypic methods for stock identification encouraged early exploration of the usefulness of genetic markers (reviewed by Cadrin et al. 2005).”
• PACIFIC SARDINE (SARDINOPS SAGAX ) ABUNDANCE, DISTRIBUTION, AND ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST (2005, unknown): “There are many non-genetic techniques that could be used to identify stock differences, including parasites (Marcogliese et al. 2002), meristics (Smith 2005), otolith elemental composition (Milton and Chenery 2001), and morphometric methods (Felin 1954; Kinsey et al. 1994; Cadrin et al. 2005).”
• Genetic and otolith isotopic markers identify salmon populations in the Columbia River at broad and fine geographic scales (2010, background): “, species’ distribution) and local spatial scales (Cadrin et al. 2005; Botsford et al. 2009; Cowen and Sponaugle 2009).”