Overcoming Selection Bias in Microcredit Impact Assessments: A Case Study in Peru

By Gwendolyn A. Tedeschi. 2008

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2940996866ab3f5dda982b54f51db2b925ee560

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. Barrett
2. Adel Varghese
3. R. B. Swain

In Management Information Systems

1. S. Barrett
2. Adel Varghese
3. R. B. Swain

Citations in the corpus

• Does Self Help Group Participation Lead to Asset Creation (2009, background): “…which relies on Grameen s eligibility rule.3 More recent papers that have exploited the panel nature of the data to remove the xed unobservables are Khandker, 2005, and Tedeschi, 2008.4 The important role assigned to SHGs in the rural credit policy of India demands an evaluation of their impact.”
• Does microfinance reduce rural poverty? Evidence based on household panel data from northern Ethiopia (2009, unknown): “Tedeschi (2008) finds positive impacts of loans on microenterprise profits.”
• Local level climate justice? Adaptation finance and vulnerability reduction (2013, background): “Indeed, microfinance research finds fixed effects necessary for rigorous case selection (Coleman, 1999; Tedeschi, 2008; Pitt and Khandker, 1998).”