Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major)

By J. Sanz, S. Kranenbarg, J. Tinbergen. 2000

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b28cd886560e08d2a45a8c85b8b36b840d54ebb6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? (2002, unknown): “Because the magnitude of such handicapping effects could easily influence our ability to detect responses by their partners (e.g., Sanz et al., 2000), we first discuss the effects of handicapping on handicapped birds, and then consider partner responses in terms of both negotiation and sealed bid…”
Negotiation over offspring care?--a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits (2006, unknown): “Examples are feather cutting (Lifjeld and Slagsvold, 1990; Moreno et al., 1999; Sanz et al., 2000; Slagsvold, 1988; Slagsvold and Lifjeld, 1990; Whittingham et al., 1994), tail weighting (Lozano and Lemon, 1996; Markman et al., 1995; Schwagmeyer et al., 2002; Wright and Cuthill, 1989, 1990a,b), or…”
To Compensate or Not? Caring Parents Respond Differentially to Mate Removal and Mate Handicapping in the Burying Beetle, Nicrophorus quadripunctatus (2009, methodology): “Subjects of prior studies of biparental care in birds generally have similar male and female food-provisioning rates (Sanz et al. 2000; Schwagmeyer et al. 2002).”
Pairs of zebra finches with similar ‘personalities’ make better parents (2011, background): “before males were removed), and/or that (2) females compensate for male absence to defend the levels of parental care provided when the partner was around (Markman et al. 1995; Sanz et al. 2000; Johnstone & Hinde 2006).”
The Evolution of Complex Begging Displays (2002, background): “Finally, sex differences in provisioning rules might persist following their initial evolution, by resolving sexual conflict over nestling provisioning in the manner predicted by Houston & Davies (1985; Wright & Cuthill 1989; Wright & Dingemanse 1999; but see Sanz et al. 2000 ).”
Sharing of caring: nestling provisioning behaviour of long-tailed tit, Aegithalos caudatus, parents and helpers (2003, result): “There is considerable empirical support for this prediction (Wright & Cuthill 1989; Hatchwell & Davies 1990; Sanz et al. 2000).”
Reduced parental care, compensatory behaviour and reproductive costs of thick-billed murres equipped with data loggers (2005, unknown): “1995), supporting dynamic models, whereas others (Sanz et al. 2000) reported full compensation.”
Avian egg colour and sexual selection: does eggshell pigmentation reflect female condition and genetic quality? (2003, background): “In an increasing number of studies, variation in nestling provisioning is largely attributable to factors that are independent of the mate’s current behavior such as differences in individual quality (e.g. Sanz et al. 2000; Schwagmeyer et al. 2002).”
Should young ever be better off with one parent than with two (2003, background): “Experiments in which the effort of one parent is manipulated (e.g., Markman et al., 1995; Sanz et al., 2000; Wright and Cuthill, 1989, 1990a,b) show that parents respond to each other’s effort.”
Blood parameters as indicators of physiological condition and skeletal development in great tits (Parus major): natural variation and application in the reproductive ecology of birds (2007, background): “It is possible that either different endocrine profiles between sexes (Klein 2000) or the greater contribution of females to offspring rearing (Sanz et al. 2000; but see Lessels et al. 1998) are behind the observed sex differences in condition indices.”
Negotiation over offspring care—how should parents respond to each other's efforts? (2006, unknown): “Existing analyses suggest that the shape of the function describing investment costs will affect parental responses (Winkler 1987; Ratnieks 1996; Sanz et al. 2000).”
How do caring parents respond to mate loss? Differential response by males and females (2005, background): “Even though this suggests that males have higher costs of food provisioning, these species have similar male and female food-provisioning rates (Sanz et al. 2000; Schwagmeyer et al. 2002).”