The relationship between cave biodiversity and available habitat

By M. Christman, D. Culver. 2001

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Earth-Surface Processes, Oceanography, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b27c31e63192218815d9c7104ff14a7c6bf1dac4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Earth-Surface Processes

1. D. Culver
2. Molly K. Madden
3. Denis White
4. W. Humphreys
5. M. Harvey
6. M. Christman

In Oceanography

1. W. Humphreys
2. D. Culver
3. Molly K. Madden
4. Denis White
5. M. Harvey
6. M. Christman
7. D. Galassi

In Paleontology

1. W. Humphreys
2. D. Culver
3. Molly K. Madden
4. Denis White
5. M. Harvey
6. M. Christman
7. P. Trontelj
8. B. Šket

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring the relationship between sampling efficiency and short‐range endemism for groundwater fauna in the Pilbara region, Western Australia (2009, background): “In conclusion, high regional richness of groundwater fauna is usually attributed to age of the landscape, habitat fragmentation, SRE and existence of suitable habitat (e.g. Christman & Culver, 2001; Humphreys, 2001; Gibert & Deharveng, 2002).”
• The mid-latitude biodiversity ridge in terrestrial cave fauna (2006, background): “of the cave fauna are the consequence of repeated, independent invasions, isolation, and adaptation to the cave environment and as such, they should be amenable to rigorous quantitative analysis ( Christman and Culver 2001 ).”
• Patterns of endemism of the eastern North American cave fauna (2005, methodology): “In some of our previous studies (Christman & Culver, 2001; Culver et al., 2004) we used the number of caves as a predictor of number of troglobionts.”
• Is the Australian subterranean fauna uniquely diverse (2010, background): “…and Culver 1994; Culver et al. 2004) the density of caves and the sampling intensity by generations of researchers in these regions have provided biologists with the opportunity to efficiently document caves and their fauna (Christman and Culver 2001; Culver et al. 2004; Zagmajster et al. 2008).”
• The North American obligate cave fauna: regional patterns (2003, background): “Since most species have very small ranges – over half are known from a single county (Culver et al. 2000) – and those species with large ranges were described prior to 1900, suggesting that a taxonomic re-examination is in order ( Christman and Culver 2001 ), we compared faunas at the level of genus”