Characterization of a microfluidic in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (μBBB).

By R. Booth, Hanseup Kim. Lab on a Chip, 2012

680 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b27afe1f23da263ff05a902a54d14497d6142521

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Rafael Gómez-Sjöberg
2. Ronan M. T. Fleming
3. I. Galea
4. Skarphedinn Halldorsson
5. E. Lucumi
6. A. Varatharaj

In Neurology

1. I. Galea
2. A. Varatharaj

In Oncology

1. I. Galea
2. A. Varatharaj

Citations in the corpus

• The blood-brain barrier in systemic inflammation. (2017, positive): “Endothelial cells may be seeded onto porous hollow fibres (Stanness et al., 1997) or microfluidic devices (Booth and Kim, 2012), to create a three-dimensional tissue culture through which flow can be recreated.”
• Biology-inspired Microphysiological System Approaches to Solve the Prediction Dilemma of Substance Testing (2016, neutral): “, 2010), the nervous system (Booth and Kim, 2012; Brown et al., 2014; Kerman et al., 2015; Nery et al., 2015; Park et al., 2009; Taylor et al., 2005), the pancreas (Silva et al.”
• Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. (2015, background): “In addition to the devices mentioned above, microfluidic devices mimicking the organ specific architecture and functionality of lung (Long et al., 2012), heart (Grosberg et al., 2011), microvascular networks (Zheng et al., 2012) and a blood brain barrier (Booth and Kim, 2012) have been developed.”