Dark matter candidates: a ten-point test

By M. Taoso, G. Bertone, A. Masiero. 2007

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

An extraordinarily rich zoo of non-baryonic dark matter candidates has been proposed over the last three decades. Here we present a ten-point test that a new particle has to pass in order to be considered a viable DM candidate. (I) Does it match the appropriate relic density? (II) Is it cold? (III) Is it neutral? (IV) Is it consistent with BBN? (V) Does it leave stellar evolution unchanged? (VI) Is it compatible with constraints on self-interactions? (VII) Is it consistent with direct DM searches? (VIII) Is it compatible with gamma-ray constraints? (IX) Is it compatible with other astrophysical bounds? (X) Can it be probed experimentally?

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b26d78b90ff62cde3500dc7136e9a181b8b8f9ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Alexey Boyarsky
  2. Oleg Ruchayskiy
  3. M. Viel
  4. Julien Lesgourgues
  5. M. Bauer
  6. Tilman Plehn
  7. D. Iakubovskyi
  8. M. Drewes

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. M. Viel
  2. Alexey Boyarsky
  3. Oleg Ruchayskiy
  4. Julien Lesgourgues
  5. M. Bauer
  6. Tilman Plehn
  7. D. Iakubovskyi
  8. M. Drewes

Citations in the corpus