Score-based causal learning in additive noise models

By Christopher Nowzohour, Peter Buhlmann. 2013

35 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Given data sampled from a number of variables, one is often interested in the underlying causal relationships in the form of a directed acyclic graph. In the general case, without interventions on some of the variables it is only possible to identify the graph up to its Markov equivalence class. However, in some situations one can find the true causal graph just from observational data, for example, in structural equation models with additive noise and nonlinear edge functions. Most current methods for achieving this rely on nonparametric independence tests. One of the problems there is that the null hypothesis is independence, which is what one would like to get evidence for. We take a different approach in our work by using a penalized likelihood as a score for model selection. This is practically feasible in many settings and has the advantage of yielding a natural ranking of the candidate models. When making smoothness assumptions on the probability density space, we prove consistency of the penalized maximum likelihood estimator. We also present empirical results for simulated scenarios and real two-dimensional data sets (cause–effect pairs) where we obtain similar results as other state-of-the-art methods.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Bernhard Schölkopf
  2. Jan Peters
  3. Dominik Janzing
  4. Joris M. Mooij
  5. Peter Buhlmann
  6. David Lopez-Paz
  7. Kun Zhang
  8. Jakob Zscheischler

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Bernhard Schölkopf
  2. Jan Peters
  3. Dominik Janzing
  4. Peter Buhlmann
  5. Joris M. Mooij
  6. Jan Ernest
  7. David Lopez-Paz
  8. Jakob Zscheischler

Citations in the corpus