Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part I: Main Content

By Liliana Orellana, Andrea Rotnitzky, James M. Robins. 2010

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

G-Net: A Deep Learning Approach to G-computation for Counterfactual Outcome Prediction Under Dynamic Treatment Regimes (2020, methodology): “G-methods include gcomputation [4–6], structural nested models [7, 8], and marginal structural models [9, 10].”
Using Decision Lists to Construct Interpretable and Parsimonious Treatment Regimes (2015, background): “Examples include marginal structural mean models (Robins et al., 2008; Orellana et al., 2010); robust marginal mean models (Zhang et al., 2012); and outcomeweighted learning (Zhang et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2012, 2015).”
Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research (2014, methodology): “Robins JM, Orellana L, Rotnitzky A. Estimation and extrapolation in optimal treatment and testing strategies.”
Incorporating Patient Preferences into Estimation of Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules (2017, unknown): “…2011; Zhao et al., 2011; Goldberg and Kosorok, 2012; Moodie et al., 2012, 2014; Laber et al., 2014; Tian et al., 2014) or policy-search-based (Orellana et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2012, 2013; Zhao et al., 2012, 2014, 2015; Laber and Zhao, 2015), though this division 18 © 2017, The…”
Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective (2012, background): “Recently, there has been vigorous research on estimating optimal treatment regimes involving a single decision or a series of decisions based on data from clinical trials or observational studies (Murphy, 2003; Robins, 2004; Moodie et al., 2007; Robins et al., 2008; Brinkley et al., 2009; Zhao et al”
A Robust Method for Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes (2012, methodology): “…be involved (Murphy, 2003; Robins, 2004; Moodie, Richardson, and Stephens, 2007; Robins, Orellana, and Rotnitzky, 2008; Brinkley, Tsiatis, and Anstrom, 2009; Zhao, Kosorok, and Zeng, 2009; Henderson, Ansell, and Alshibani, 2010; Orellana, Rotnitzky, and Robins, 2010; Gunter, Zhu, and Murphy, 2011).”
Robust estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes for sequential treatment decisions (2013, methodology): “See Rosthøj et al. (2006), Murphy et al. (2007), Zhao et al. (2009) and Henderson et al. (2010) for applications; related methods are discussed by Robins (2004), Moodie et al. (2007), Robins et al. (2008), Almirall et al. (2010) and Orellana et al. (2010).”
Comparative effectiveness of dynamic treatment regimes: an application of the parametric g-formula (2011, methodology): “Cain et al. [3] applied inverse probability (IP) weighting of dynamic marginal structural models [2, 9, 16 , 17] to observational data from the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration, and emulated a randomized clinical trial with multiple initiation strategies similar to the ones described above.”
Interactive Q-learning for Probabilities and Quantiles (2014, unknown): “, 2010), and policy search methods (Orellana et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012b,a, 2013).”
New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes (2015, methodology): “Other approaches to direct maximization include robust estimation (Zhang et al. 2013) and the use of marginal structural mean models (Orellana, Rotnitzky, and Robins 2010).”
TREE-BASED REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR ESTIMATING OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES (2018, background): “and ROBINS, J. M. (2001). Marginal structural models to estimate the joint causal effect of nonrandomized treatments. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96 440–448. HSER, Y.-I., ANGLIN, M. D., GRELLA, C., LONGSHORE, D. and PRENDERGAST, M. L. (1997). Drug treatment careers A conceptual f”
Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles (2017, background): “…structural models (MSMs) are one type of direct-search estimators (Robins 2000; van der Laan, Petersen, and Joffe 2005; van der Laan 2006; van der Laan and Petersen 2007; Bembom and van der Laan 2008; Robins, Orellana, and Rotnitzky 2008; Orellana, Rotnitzky, and Robins 2010; Petersen et al. 2014).”