Comparison between various notions of conserved charges in asymptotically AdS spacetimes

By S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, D. Marolf. 2005

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We derive Hamiltonian generators of asymptotic symmetries for general relativity with asymptotic AdS boundary conditions using the ‘covariant phase space’ method of Wald et al. We then compare our results with other definitions that have been proposed in the literature. We find that our definition agrees with that proposed by Ashtekar et al, with the spinor definition, and with the background-dependent definition of Henneaux and Teitelboim. Our definition disagrees with that obtained from the ‘counterterm subtraction method’, but the difference is found to consist only of a ‘constant offset’ that is determined entirely in terms of the boundary metric. We finally discuss and justify our boundary conditions by a linear perturbation analysis, and we comment on generalizations of our boundary conditions, as well as inclusion of matter fields.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2661e5edca763c292da3693679a585c0566e03d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. T. Faulkner
  2. Thomas Hartman
  3. G. Barnich
  4. Per Kraus
  5. R. Myers
  6. T. Takayanagi
  7. Mark Van Raamsdonk
  8. Ricardo Troncoso

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Thomas Hartman
  2. Andrew Strominger
  3. G. Barnich
  4. Per Kraus
  5. R. Myers
  6. T. Faulkner
  7. T. Takayanagi
  8. G. Compère

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Thomas Hartman
  2. G. Barnich
  3. R. Myers
  4. Per Kraus
  5. Andrew Strominger
  6. T. Faulkner
  7. Mark Van Raamsdonk
  8. Ricardo Troncoso

Citations in the corpus