THE SISTER-GROUP OF TELEOSTEI: CONSENSUS AND DISAGREEMENTS

By G. Arratia. 2001

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2596022d14c75317f0275d6255716cdde28dc61

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. M. Friedman
2. E. Hilton
3. Axel Meyer
4. Rafael Zardoya
5. G. Arratia

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Friedman
2. E. Hilton
3. Axel Meyer
4. Rafael Zardoya
5. G. Arratia

Citations in the corpus

• Morphology, Taxonomy, and Phylogeny of Triassic Pholidophorid Fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei) (2013, background): “3; Arratia, 2001, 2008, 2009).”
• The early evolution of ray‐finned fishes (2015, background): “Each possible resolution of the neopterygian three-taxon problem has been argued (Patterson 1994; Arratia 2001), and only recently has a stable hypothesis emerged.”
• A contribution to the comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony -tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha) (2002, background): “1D), as did Taverne (1979; see below); †Ichthyodectiformes is currently interpreted by most systematists working on teleosts as a stem-group within Teleostei (e.g. Patterson & Rosen, 1977; Arratia, 1997, 2001; Taverne, 1998).”
• Recent Advances in the (Molecular) Phylogeny of Vertebrates (2003, background): “There is also no consensus on the identity of the closest living sistergroup of teleosts (Arratia 2001).”