Saproxylic Insect Ecology and the Sustainable Management of Forests

By S. Grove. 2002

790 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b230c674e70b18321ed171df2a388bce7388d350

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

A Red List of Italian Saproxylic Beetles: taxonomic overview, ecological features and conservation issues (Coleoptera) (2015, background): “As shown by some studies (Ranius & Jansson 2000; Grove 2002), all the dead wood is important, but more is the size of the debris, higher is the environmental suitability for saproxylic insects (bigger is better: Grove 2002).”
Soil fauna responses to natural disturbances, invasive species, and global climate change: Current state of the science and a call to action (2017, background): “Although saproxylic insects are recognized as an integral part of the forest landscape and in the breakdown of dead woody tissue (Grove, 2002), their impact on biogeochemistry has only recently been explored (Cobb et al.”
Mimicking natural disturbances of boreal forests: the effects of controlled burning and creating dead wood on beetle diversity (2007, background): “The volume and quality of dead wood is considered a major factor affecting the species richness of saproxylic beetles in boreal forests (Martikainen et al. 2000; Siitonen 2001; Grove 2002).”
The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: from pest to keystone species (2008, background): “In forests, competition between humans and saproxylic beetles has a long history ( Grove 2002 ).”
Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle - A case study for saproxylic insect conservation (2007, background): “In the case of many other saproxylic beetles (Grove, 2002; Ranius, 2006), the distance to the next colonised oak tree is a significant predictor of occurrence probability.”
Impacts of dead wood manipulation on the biodiversity of temperate and boreal forests. A systematic review (2019, background): “Intensification of forest management has heavily reduced the amount and diversity of DW and dying trees throughout the world (Gauthier, Bernier, Kuuluvainen, Shvidenko, & Schepaschenko, 2015), resulting in losses of saproxylic species (e.g. Grove, 2002a; Seibold et al., 2015).”
Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges (2007, background): “1986, 1997) may be higher than those of the other taxa (Grove 2002).”
Microclimate and habitat heterogeneity as the major drivers of beetle diversity in dead wood (2016, positive): “In managed forests, dead-wood availability is generally lower than in natural forests (Grove 2002; Gossner et al. 2013b) as trees are harvested in a premature state (Lindenmayer, Laurance & Franklin 2012) and dead wood is frequently removed for use as fuel or to control pests (Lassauce, Lieutier & B”
“Primeval forest relict beetles” of Central Europe: a set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants (2018, background): “The anthropogenic pressure on forests in Central Europe has a continuous history of more than a millennium (Grove 2002).”
Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood - Lessons for Dead Wood Management (2005, background): “We focus on the situation in Fennoscandian boreal forests, however, the problems are general to many forest ecosystems (Harmon 2001, Grove 2002).”